Issue

Vol. 64 No. 13: Issue 13

The undersigned hereby assign all rights, included but not limited to copyright, for this manuscript to CMB Association upon its submission for consideration to publication on Cellular and Molecular Biology. The rights assigned include, but are not limited to, the sole and exclusive rights to license, sell, subsequently assign, derive, distribute, display and reproduce this manuscript, in whole or in part, in any format, electronic or otherwise, including those in existence at the time this agreement was signed. The authors hereby warrant that they have not granted or assigned, and shall not grant or assign, the aforementioned rights to any other person, firm, organization, or other entity. All rights are automatically restored to authors if this manuscript is not accepted for publication.

Comparison the biodegradation of herbicide pyroxasulfone by some soil bacteria

https://doi.org/10.14715/cmb/2018.64.13.3
Gurdal Kanat
Department of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Yildiz Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey

Corresponding Author(s) : Gurdal Kanat

gkanat@gmail.com

Cellular and Molecular Biology, Vol. 64 No. 13: Issue 13

Abstract

The biodegradation of pyroxasulfone (C12H14F5N3O4S), which is the selective herbicide in wheat farming in Turkey is compared with some soil bacteria. These microorganisms were isolated in collected soil samples in Thrace region of Turkey from an agricultural area previously unexposed to pyroxasulfone. The microbial biodegradation of pyroxasulfone was investigated using liquid experiments with identified cultures to determine which of the microorganisms shows best removal performance under agitated culture conditions. The experiments continued about two weeks.  Five different apparatuses, were set up and pyroxasulfone in 750 ppm concentration (advised concentration of wheat farmers) was added to each Erlenmayer flasks. Approximately 107CFU/ml of each bacteria added to these flasks. These flasks were shaken at 130rpm at 27 0C in sterile conditions for 8 days. Every day, each sample was collected by filtering from flasks and Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD), biochemical oxygen demand (BOD5), total organic carbon (TOC) was determined.  As a result of the study, best removal performance observed in Bacillus thuringiensis and Fusarium fujikuroi as 91 and 93% at 7 days in COD, 88 and 83% in BOD5, 90 and 86% in TOC parameters. The lowest performance was seen on Clostridium tetani species for COD, BOD5 and TOC as 55%, 61% and 60% respectively on 7 days. The performance for Bacillus simplex and Bacillus megaterium species occurred between 70% and 80% for these three parameters.

Keywords

Biodegradation Pyroxasulfone Chemical oxygen demand Biochemical oxygen demand Total organic carbon.
Kanat, G. (2018). Comparison the biodegradation of herbicide pyroxasulfone by some soil bacteria. Cellular and Molecular Biology, 64(13), 10–14. https://doi.org/10.14715/cmb/2018.64.13.3
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
References
  1. Oliveira-Silva JJ, Alves SR, Meyer A. Influence of socioeconomic factors on the
  2. pesticides poisoning Brazil. Rev. Saude. Publica. 2001; 35(2): 130-135
  3. Goncalves C, JEsteves da Silva CG, Alpendurada MF. Chemometric interpretation of pesticide occurrence in soil samples from an intensive horticulture area in North Portugal. Analytica. Chimica. Acta. 2006; 506, 164–171.
  4. Liu Î¥, Xu Z, Wu X, Gui W, Zhu G. Adsorption and desorption behavior of herbicide diuron on various Chinese cultivated soils. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010; 178, 462–468.
  5. Vega AB,. Frenich AG, Vidal JLM. Monitoring of pesticides in agricultural water and soil samples from Andalusia by liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry. Analytica Chimica Acta. 2005; 538, 117–127.
  6. Zotti M, Di Piazza S, Roccotiello E, Lucchetti G, Mariotti MG, Marescotti P. Microfungi in highly copper-contaminated soils from an abandoned Fe–Cu sulphide mine: growth responses tolerance and bioaccumulation. Chemosphere. 2014; 117, 471–476.
  7. Bacosa H, Suto K, Inoue C. Preferential degradation of aromatic hydrocarbons in kerosene by a microbial consortium. Int Biodeter Biodegr. 2010; 64(8): 702–710.
  8. Atlas RM, Bartha R. Microbial Ecology. Fundamentals & Applications, 4th edition, Benjamin/Cummings Pubs. Company Inc. Calif., 1998.
  9. FAO. Guidelines for soil descriptions, 5th ed. Rome: FAO. 2006.
  10. Zelles L, Adrian P, Bai QY, Stepper K, Adrian MV, Fischer K, Maier A, Ziegler A. Microbial activity measured in soils stored under different temperature and humidity conditions. Soil Biol Biochem. 1991; (23): 955-962.
  11. Cruikshank R., (1972). "Medical Microbiology 11th Ed.”, Livingstone, London, P: 356
  12. Richards LA. Diagnosis and ımprovement of saline and alkali soils, USDA Agriculture Handbook, No:60, 1954.
  13. Bower CA, Wilcox LV. Soluble Salts, In: Black, C.A., et al., Methods of Soil Analysis, American Society of Agronomy, Madison, 1965; 933-940.
  14. Walkley A, Black IA. An examination of the degtjareff method for determining organic carbon in soils: effect of variations in digestion conditions and of inorganic soil constituents. Soil Sci. 1934; 63, 251-263.
  15. J.M. Bremner, Methods of soil analysis Part 2: Chemical and microbiological properties, Inc. Pub. Agron. Series. Madison Wisconsin, U.S.A. 1965; No:9
  16. Bouyoucos GJ, Hydrometer method ımproved for making particle size analysis of soils. Agron. J. 1962; 54, 464-465.
  17. Johnson AI. Methods of measuring soil moisture in the field. Geological Survey Water- Supply. 1962; 1619-U. Washington: U.S. GPO. e60pp. 2 copies.
  18. Kacar B, Kovancı ć°. Chemical phosphorus analyses on crop soil fertilizers and evaluations. Journal of Ege University Faculty of Agriculture. 1982; No: 354 ć°zmir, Türkiye.
  19. Doll EC, Lucas RE. In: Soil Testing and Plant Analysis, Testing Soils For Potassium, Calcium and Magnesium. Walsh LM, Beaton JD (eds.), Madison, WI: Soil Science Society of America, 1973, pp. 133-151.
  20. Weisberg WG, Barns SM, Pelletier DA, Lane DJ. 16S Ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study. Journal of Bacteriology.1991; 173: 697–703.
  21. Erguven GO. Monitoring the ethalfluralin biodegradation with certain bactofungi mixed culture. Desalination and Water Treatment. 2017; 70, 322–329.
  22. Ammouneh H, Harba M, Idrıs E, Makee H. Isolation and characterization of native Bacillus thuringiensis isolates from Syrian soil and testing of their insecticidal activities against some insect pests. Turk J Agric For. 2011; 35, 421-431 .
  23. Heyman J, Logan NA. Rodriguez-Diaz M, Scheldeman P, Lebbe L. Study of mural painting isolates leading to the transfer of "Bacillus maroccanus” and "Bacillus simplex” emended description of "Bacillus simplex” re-examination of the strains previously attributed to "Bacillus macroides” and description of "Bacillus muralis sp”. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2005; 55, 119-131.
  24. Khallil ARMA, El-Hissy FT, Bagy MMK. Mycoflora of mangroves of Red Sea in Egypt. Folia Microbiologica 1991; 36(5): 456–464.
  25. Chitra B, Harshab P, Sadhana G, Soni R. Isolation characteriazation of bacterial isolates from agricultural soil at durg district. Indian Journal of Scientific Research. 2014; 4(1): 221- 226.
  26. Amin M, Rakhis Z, Ahmady AZ. Isolation and Identification of Bacillus Species From Soil and Evaluation of Their Antibacterial Properties. Avicenna Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infection 2015; 2(1): e23233.
  27. Standard Methods for The Examination of Water and Wastewater, 20th edition, American Public Health Association (APHA), the American Water Works Association (AWWA), and the Water Environment Federation (WEF). 2012; ISBN: 9780875530130
  28. Atay N. Investigation removal of some pesticides by ralstonia eutropha. PhD thesis Fırat University Institude of natural Sciences Elazığ, 2007.
  29. Maya K, Singh RS, Upadhyay SN, Dubey SK. Kinetic analysis reveals bacterial efficacy for biodegradation of chlorpyrifos and its hydrolyzing metabolite TCP Process. Biochem. 2011; 46, 2130–2136.
  30. Erguven GO, Yildirim N. Efficiency of some soil bacteria for chemical oxygen demand reduction of synthetic chlorsulfuron solutions under agiated culture conditions. Cell. Mol. Biol. 2016; 62(6): 92-96.
  31. Fernandes CCT, Pizano AM, Morales AAM. Characterization, Modes of Action and Effects of Trifluralin. A Review. Agricultural and Biological Sciences. Herbicides - Current Research and Case Studies in Use. 2012; doi: 10.5772/55169.
  32. Zayeda IY, Mostafaa MM, Parghalya HSH, Attabya YM, Adama, Pathia MM. Microbial Degradation of Trifluralin by Aspergillus carneus, Fusarium oxysporum and Trichoderma viride. J Environ Sci Health B: Pesticides, Food Contaminants and Agricultural Wastes. 1983; 18(2): 253-267
  33. Bellinaso MDL, Greer CW, Peralba MC, Henriques JAP, Gaylarde CC. Biodegradation of the herbicide trifluralin by bacteria isolated from soil. FEMS microbiol. Ecol. 2003; 43(2): 191–194.
  34. Belala BE, Mohamed FEN. Bioremediation of pendimethalin-contaminated soil. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 2013; 7(21): 2574-2588.
  35. Belal EB, Negwa ME. Biodegradation of pendimethalin residues by P. Chrysosporıum in aquatic system and soils. J. Biol. Chem. Environ. Sci. 2014; 9(3): 383- 400.
  36. Erguven GO, Bayhan H, Ikızoglu B, Kanat G., Demir G. Removal Rate Of Herbicide Aclonifen With Isolated Bacteria And Fungi. AEER. 2016; 14(2): 351-365.
  37. Erguven GO, Bayhan H, Demir G, Ikizoglu B, Kanat G. Monitoring aclonifen remediation in soil with a laboratory-scale research. Journal of Chemistry. 2016; Article ID: 5059049, 8 pages.
Read More
Author biographies is not available.
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC
Download this PDF file
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 1066 Download : 544