Issue
The undersigned hereby assign all rights, included but not limited to copyright, for this manuscript to CMB Association upon its submission for consideration to publication on Cellular and Molecular Biology. The rights assigned include, but are not limited to, the sole and exclusive rights to license, sell, subsequently assign, derive, distribute, display and reproduce this manuscript, in whole or in part, in any format, electronic or otherwise, including those in existence at the time this agreement was signed. The authors hereby warrant that they have not granted or assigned, and shall not grant or assign, the aforementioned rights to any other person, firm, organization, or other entity. All rights are automatically restored to authors if this manuscript is not accepted for publication.
Preservation effect of meat product by natural antioxidant tea polyphenol
Corresponding Author(s) : Y-E. Sun
yueesun@163.com
Cellular and Molecular Biology,
Vol. 62 No. 13: Issue 13
Abstract
1% of tea polyphenol, chitosan solution and potassium sorbate were used as film-forming materials to coat chilled mutton. Total coliforms, TVB-N value and pH value were determined and used as the mutton fresh-keeping indexes. The results showed that after 12th day at the end of the storage, mutton coated with tea polyphenol had best effects comparing chitosan solution and potassium sorbate. pH value of mutton coated by tea polyphenol was 6.0, TVB-N and the total coliforms were both significantly lower than the meat coated by chitosan solution and potassium sorbate. Also, mutton coated by tea polyphenol accorded with the requirements of national standards about fresh meat quality. In summary, the tea polyphenol film was the most suitable film on chilled mutton coating preservation among the three chemicals used in this research.
Keywords
Tea polyphenol
chitosan solution
potassium sorbate
coliform
coating preservation.
Wang, W.-D., & Sun, Y.-E. (2016). Preservation effect of meat product by natural antioxidant tea polyphenol. Cellular and Molecular Biology, 62(13), 44–48. https://doi.org/10.14715/cmb/2016.62.13.8
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)BibTeX