The undersigned hereby assign all rights, included but not limited to copyright, for this manuscript to CMB Association upon its submission for consideration to publication on Cellular and Molecular Biology. The rights assigned include, but are not limited to, the sole and exclusive rights to license, sell, subsequently assign, derive, distribute, display and reproduce this manuscript, in whole or in part, in any format, electronic or otherwise, including those in existence at the time this agreement was signed. The authors hereby warrant that they have not granted or assigned, and shall not grant or assign, the aforementioned rights to any other person, firm, organization, or other entity. All rights are automatically restored to authors if this manuscript is not accepted for publication.
Prognosis of human liver transplantation
Corresponding Author(s) : A. Cherid
U559@medecine.univ-mrs.fr
Cellular and Molecular Biology,
Vol. 54 No. 2: General Papers
Abstract
The results of publications on liver transplantation were diverse since several years, without model prognosis. The impossibility was due to the international system of measurement. We resorted to vector functions for calculating the ratios of biological values. We studied 2 samples with the same total number (35patients) in the same conditions. We proposed 2 vector functions of transplants: αv1 weight/age donor and recipient in proportion to obtain a medium coefficient; γv2 ratio of biliary volume/700mL (minimum secretion); β was the coefficient of ratio ALT/AST (transaminases). After evaluation of 560 observations and mathematical control about 3000 numbers, we compared the samples with 10 parameters without significant difference between variances, means, other values; with consented errors α = β = 0.05; γ < 10-7; means of relative errors = ± 0.03 negligible. The results were verified by diverse tests (standard deviation of differences, χ2-test, relative risk, odds ratio, comparisons of distributions, parent population, equations of normality, partial correlations, partial regression coefficients, multiple regression, coefficient β. Final results : quantitative prognosis by grading ; right responders to immunosuppressive treatment without complications, RR1 fast response (scores 3.5 ; 4) ; RR2 slow response (scores 2 ; 2.5 ; 3). Partial responders: very slow response (score 2; 2.5; 3) with transitory complications. Those patients were in recovery (81.5â„…). Wrong responders (score 2), 4 deaths (5.5â„…) by ARS; score 2.5, 1 death (1.5â„…) by ARS. We subtracted β from these scores to differentiate them. Non-responders (score 1.5), 2 deaths (3â„…) by ARS.
Keywords
Liver transplantation
Comparisons of samples
Parent population
Evaluation of parameters
Tests of control
Relationships and equations of vector functions
Model of calculation
Multiple regression
Acute Rejection Syndrome
Prognosis.
Cherid, A., Cherid, N., Chamlian, V., Boutaghou, H. O., & Chamlian, A. (2008). Prognosis of human liver transplantation. Cellular and Molecular Biology, 54(2), 1062–76. Retrieved from http://cellmolbiol.org/index.php/CMB/article/view/1029
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)BibTeX